Autumn at the Old Pond wallpaper
The brain is an amazing and complex thing, according to Waterloo professor Chris Eliasmith. He should know. He’s building one.
A team led by the Canada Research Chair in Theoretical Neuroscience has created the world’s largest functional brain model. Their research was published Nov. 29 by Science.
Called Spaun, the model can see, remember, think and write using a mechanical arm. Right now, Spaun and its environment are housed in a computer. So Spaun lives in a simulated world with simulated physics. Still, Spaun uses only its brain to understand images it sees, and “move” its virtual arm. In short, it uses the same processes that your brain does to pick up a cup of coffee.
“It has been interesting to see the reactions people have had to Spaun. Even seasoned academics have not seen brain models that actually perform so many tasks. Models are typically small, and focus on one function,” says Eliasmith, who is jointly appointed to the departments of philosophy and systems design engineering, and cross-appointed to computer science at the University of Waterloo.
Currently, other large-scale brain models (over a million neurons or so) do one thing — mimic lots of neurons. Spaun does that too (it has 2.5 million neurons), but more importantly, it is constructed so those neurons actually think about patterns it encounters and make things happen in its environment (and you can watch videos of it working).
To build it, Eliasmith and his team had to create specific brain systems, using methods from a number of different fields, including engineering, computer science, biology, philosophy, psychology and statistics.
“The reason that the Spaun model is so compelling, is that it brings all of this work together,” he said.
“Human cognition isn’t interesting because we can recognize visual patterns … move our arms in an integrated way … [or] solve a particular task or puzzle. It’s interesting because we can do all of this with the same brain, in any order, and at any time.”
Rapid Variable Creation video
I’ll save the warnings about mutant cyborgs enslaving mankind to blogs that specialize in such speculation. For now Spaun’s real world applications, besides just the fascination of something non-human thinking, are insights such a simulated systems can provide into human problems. Notably by simulating the way some drugs act on the brain, how the brain copes with a stroke and how neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s disease affect thinking.
The Glacial Chronicles: A student documents life and research in Greenland
Consider permafrost. Permafrost is a thick layer of subsurface soil in polar regions that remains frozen year-round. You may not have realized that permafrost contains vast quantities of carbon that was frozen in place thousands of years ago. As the planet warms, and permafrost melts, this ancient carbon becomes food for microbes that transform that carbon into CO2 gas and methane (CH4), which warms the planet, melts more permafrost, and produces more CO2 and CH4.
Ice cores taken from the Antarctic Ice Sheet give us a datable record of the atmospheric CO2 concentrations through time. These records tell us that ice ages are often ended by sharp, fast upswings in CO2. Those upswings could very well be the release of CO2 from melting permafrost.
There are many CO2 feedback loops, and glaciers and permafrost are just part of a few of them. Serious accounting skills are required to understand the delicate balance between all of the world’s CO2 feedback loops, as well as all the sources and sinks for CO2.
Most of Greenland is covered with an ice sheet that reaches two miles thick. If the entire ice sheet melted, it would raise the global ocean’s sea level by 23 feet. That scenario is unlikely, but accelerated flows of ice to the ocean that raise sea levels far less would still cause problems. (Photo by Ben Linhoff, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution)
I snipped one of the more technical passages, but besides the technical in formation, this is a good read. Like a written version of a national Geographic special. Even those without much science background should enjoy the story.
While we’re on the subject of climate change, Meet The Climate Denial Machine
Despite the overwhelming consensus among climate experts that human activity is contributing to rising global temperatures, 66 percent of Americans incorrectly believe there is “a lot of disagreement among scientists about whether or not global warming is happening.” The conservative media has fueled this confusion by distorting scientific research, hyping faux-scandals, and giving voice to groups funded by industries that have a financial interest in blocking action on climate change. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets have shied away from the “controversy” over climate change and have failed to press U.S. policymakers on how they will address this global threat. When climate change is discussed, mainstream outlets sometimes strive for a false balance that elevates marginal voices and enables them to sow doubt about the science even in the face of mounting evidence.
Here, Media Matters looks at how conservative media outlets give industry-funded “experts” a platform, creating a polarized misunderstanding of climate science.
One of the first things one wants to do to hide dangerous misinformation that affects millions of lives how and the future is to name your junk science foundation something that sounds wholesome and all American, like the propagandists at Heartland Institute or The American Tradition Institute. If those don’t sucker some folks in there is always the junk science from the patriotic sounding Heritage Foundation or the American Enterprise Institute. We all like enterprise and the heartland, right? So in addition to hurting the USA and our natural heritage with science that is bought and paid for, they’re also insulting.
Finally, some more bad news, 2012 breeding season worst on record for many UK nesting birds
The latest results from these BTO surveys show that many species struggled to raise young during 2012. “Caterpillars appear to have been in short supply during the cold, wet weather and many of the woodland birds dependent on them had a poor season,” noted Carl Barimore, NRS Organiser. “Blue tit, Great tit and Chaffinch fledged 13%, 18% and 58% fewer chicks respectively; this is the lowest productivity recorded for Chaffinch in almost 50 years and the second lowest for Great tit over the same period. Rainfall may have made hunting difficult for raptor and owl species too, and Kestrel breeding success was also significantly lower than average.”
Bad year for migrants
Results from the CES scheme showed that migrant birds also fared badly. “All eight of the migrant species monitored by CES experienced the worst breeding year since the scheme began 30 years ago,” reported Allison Kew, CES Organiser. “These estimates relate to the numbers of free-flying juveniles ringed, so are likely to reflect losses in the nest and the low survival rates of young birds after they have left it – their inexperience in foraging and poor quality plumage is likely to be a disadvantage in wet, windy conditions. Wetland species such as Reed Warbler and Reed Bunting were also directly affected by flooding.”But will the poor season in 2012 have a lasting effect on our birds? “There is no doubt that many fewer young birds fledged this year and current predictions of another cold winter suggest that survival rates over coming months may be low”, explains Dr Dave Leech, a Senior Research Ecologist at BTO.
People can help to some degree by setting up bird feeders, but for birds whose diet is mostly insect and caterpillars, that will not do much good. It might help in the long run to plant flowers and shrubs that butterflies and moths like. That will in turn help the birds.
You must be logged in to post a comment.